Molestation

okay so youtube took it down. but it's being posted on another web.

i guess i dont have to explain what it is ;\

i mean, it's the hot topic right now, yeah?

sooooooo.. yeahs.

was she enjoying it? or was she actually molested?

no one knows lah. but then if you actually look carefully, she was smiling ;\

i think. haha.

at first i was like angry lah. like i mean, no one helped her!

and i meannnnn. omgggg. but she also like very stupid can.

you would retaliate or do something what. but she like, just tried to squirm.

i mean, i would've kicked the guy's balls or something.

HELLOOOOO? WHERE'S HER NATURAL INSTINCTS??!!

okay but people are saying that's she deserves it, she's a transexual, blahblahblah.

but transexual or not, those guys should be put behind bars for what they did.

that's cause they intended to do so. and since they had the intention, they are deemed guilty.

believe or not, i searched the Singapore law thingy. lololll. im serious.

okay here's the link if you dont. --> Criminallaw.sg

or maybe if you're lazy, im just gonna copy & paste.

Molest

The Court has a discretion to impose a fine or a jail sentence in a molest case. Much depends on the part of the body of the victim which the Accused had contact with.

The offence cited in the case of Chandresh Patel v PP [1995], the prevailing sentence for victim’s private parts or sexual organs is 9 months imprisonment with caning.

Section 354 reads “Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage the modesty of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with caning, or with any two of such punishments.”

As such an Accused often raise the defence that he had no intention to touch the victim as alleged ie the act was accidental. This is a question of fact to be inferred from the circumstances, the victim's testimony and the Accused's version as eye witness are not common. Most of the time, the Accused's long statement would have sealed his fate.

there you go. so you see, first of all, since they intended "to outrage or knowing it to be likely that [they] will thereby outrage the modesty of that person", they are deemed guilty.

secondly, it was intentional cause it's obviously not accidental as you can see. thirdly, there were many eye witness plus video as evidence. and so since the contact was the "victim’s private parts or sexual organs", the sentence would be "9 months imprisonment with caning".

woohoo. i have great Literature skills intact. ;pp

;D i always knew i should be a lawyer. HAHA. whateverrrrrzxzx.

alrights. am going out with cleo, sarah, alina & angelyn tmrrrr.

go Party World. first time going there.hahaha.

oh no im brokeee! gahhs.

and school's startingggg.

im thinking whether to go or not. but before or that, i have to decide whether i can wake up.

;X haha. soooooo, yeaps. that's all. byeeee!

&love isnt what we thought it was, right?